Time to Start

Hi all you readers out there,

I'm back and its time to start that Lv3 History work but I kinda of forgotten it a bit, so I need to review my work first....... and done, I've looked at my past work but I'm not sure how to  blog about the effects European theories had on the native people of New Zealand, The Maori, analytical.

I guess I should go through the theory's first

Belief/theory	Background	Main ideas	How would this affect European behaviour?	How would this affect Maori behaviour?
“Noble Savage”	Rousseau - philosophy	Europeans see themselves as corrupt	Treat them like an endangered species Ignore them Jealous	Might be frustrated/angry
“Ignoble Savage”	Cannibalism Europeans being attacked	Maori are bloodthirsty and not to be trusted	Maori blamed more; Europeans wary of Maori Scared More violent towards Maori	Maori feel more powerful Protect themselves more
Monogenism	Biblical	Single ancestor, but some people are better than others	See Maori as distant relations Treat Maori worse Some feel obliged to ‘help Maori’	Some might accept this
Polygenism	Self-made theories?	Every race is a different breed of human being	Maori will fall back to their old ways given the chance No point ‘helping’ Maori
Social Darwinism	Origin of Species by Charles Darwin	Strong races survive Maori are a ‘dying race’	Hard racism Hierarchy of races Leave Maori to die off	Probably Maori would not engage with this idea
Fatal Impact	Social  Looking at what Europeans bring to NZ	Without contact with Europeans, Maori would not be in a bad state	Might make Europeans change the way they behave	Might be racist towards Europeans?
Aryan Maori	Edward Tregear The Aryan Maori	Maori are Aryan Racial harmony	Similar to Monogenism With ‘master-race’ tones	Accepted this theory (Peter Buck)
Anti-Capitalist Maori	Urbanisation	Maori can’t cope with move to urban areas	Polygenism in 20th Century	Anger
“Once Were Warriors”	Maori Battalion	Maori only good at fighting	Stereotyping Maori

all of these theory are based on trust, faith and semi to complete lack of evidence (kinda like a world famous book) so if based on flimsy foundation why did Europeans believe in this theories, while its important to understand that every European who came to New Zealand didn't believe in every and or any of these theories. Now back to the question, for the Europeans who did believe in these or a theory, why believe them. these theories were backed up by or from famous people and influences who the Europeans trusted. (see background column)
As pointed out by Lv3 History Class mates it kinda like sheep flowing the most influential and trustworthy information source that they believe in. so even before coming to New Zealand Europeans could have already set there theory's in stone.
Now these theory are basically the same to each other on some levels but I can see that some of them as building of each other. for example 'Monogenism' and the 'Aryan Maori' both see humans as decedents of a single ancestor and that the Europeans should help the Maori's

Hey faithful Readers (Hahahaha)

It been along time since my last post where I talked about how it was long time since the post before then. I'm back to once again do a school project this time its for my level 3 History class were I have create a blog post which reflects on the European theories had on the native people of New Zealand, The Maori. I have to connect similar features of the theories, and any conclusions that I have come to, while trying to figure out prioritize/rate the theories. Making sure the post is going beyond merely explaining the ideas.

so lets see if I can do this

Sincerely,

Beckm.mar